Latin America, common roots but full of diversity!!

Latin America, closer to our hearts

(Map available at Yahoo Images)

Latin America means home for us, but it is a definition that still many of us don’t understand, since sometimes we think about it just as south America, but it means a connection with the roots of our languages so it goes up to Mexico and even includes the province of Quebec in Panamá.

But as a closer place for us there was a presentation, of Juliana Chacón, Mónica Ordoñes and Jaime Andrés Cardona, that focused on three main aspects, politics, economy and culture, which we are going to explain here.

So starting with politics, they highlighted in the presentation that there is not coordination between Latin American countries towards a common political style, what makes it hard for the region to take common decisions looking for a common goal and does not allow coordination in the activities they undertake together.

That also, has made possible to identify smaller groups taking similar directions, and at the moment those are center-left, radical left and center-right.

The center-left is related to social democracy and seeks to have a mixed economy and a regulation within the market in order to guarantee an egalitarian system. Right now, the most important country with this tendency is Brazil with Lula Da Silva, Chile with Michelle Bachelet and Paraguay with Lugo, among others.

The radical left is based on a total equalitarian base and takes as guide the theorist from Marx, Lenin, Stalin and Trotsky. It is against capitalism and it uses a populist rhetoric.

According to the presentation, it looks for an immediate well-being but doesn’t think in the long term, gets in debts that are hard to pay and wants to give total employment without thinking about productivity.

And here it goes against the “imperialism” of the States in Latin America.

The most recognized left government is the one in Venezuela with Chavez, and then we consider its friends Cuba with Castro, Bolivia with Morales, Ecuador with Correa and Nicaragua with Ortega.

And finally, the center-right is the one in favor of the free market, promoting Foreign Direct Investment, reducing taxes and like that reducing the public costs.

The main countries with this tendency are Colombia with Uribe, Perú with García and México with Calderón.

Nonetheless, this perspectives and view doesn’t seem to be considered stable for the following years since the next year there are elections in many countries of the region and the outcomes are still unsure for some of them.

The economy has as main region integrations ALCA, ALADI, CAN, MCCA, MERCOSUR and AEC.

The ALCA is an initiative to have a Free trade Area for the whole Americas, but right now it is finding a huge opposition from countries as Brazil, Argentina and Venezuela who propones the ALBA as an ALCA (Alternativa Bolivariana par alas Americas) opposite.

ALADI is an important institution in the region, it doesn’t subscribe commercial agrrements but it seeks to coordinate the intentions to achieve an economic integration and promotes the subscription of FTA’s and others.

The CAN, MERCOSUR, CACM and AEC are regional economic integrations that are aiming somehow an economic union. Despite of this the efforts are hard because of some differences among the members. From those the closest one is CACM, which is a common market already.

And finally, concerning cultural diversity it was highlighted that there are many racial groups thanks to the mixed of cultures and people, the indigenous habitants and then the European migrants and the African they brought, and unlike in other European colonization this time there was a mixed of races creating like that the mestizos (European and indigenous) and mulattos (African and the others).

That has made Latin America a culture full of diversity and a colorful continent.
With languages Spanish is the most influential, but there are other languages as Portuguese and French.

Latin America is definitely a beautiful continent full of places and cultures to explore.

Special Note:
This Blog was made and design by María Camila Restrepo Zuluaga, Julia María Rodas Jaramillo and María Natalia Suárez Vallejo.

References:
Cardona, J.A. & Chacón, J. & Ordoñez, M. & Vargas, N. 2009. Presentation "Latin America: A gaze around the region" part of the subject Organizations and Cultures at the University EAFIT

Course Evaluation

Organizations and Cultures

The course Organizations and Cultures is a very interesting course and which is important for our studies due to the closer look it gives to the importance of cultures in organizations, the meaning of diversity and tries to makes us closer to the global context.

I enjoyed a lot the topics and how the subject wants to makes us more critic on what we read and know and how it is important to question things and look for those answers.

The part of the expositions/presentations is good in the way that people can be creative, become expert on a topic and develop skills to share that with the class. However, there is also a huge flaw in the methodology and it is how mediocre the student community in EAFIT tends to be. There have been amazing expositions that show the interest of the people on the topics, the commitment and investigation to do something smart, but there are also some of them that should feel ashamed to do such a presentation in a university environment. Some of them even make mistakes in the titles that are inacceptable, and more if we are support to be experts, other talk about things that have nothing to do with the topic and the real issues to be addressed are left behind and other just make it heavy and sometimes unbearable.

But finally, when it comes for us to be critic about it we stay quiet, because we don’t wanna be pointed as the ones trying to affect our classmates and become an outcast.

Hopefully, with time we are more willing to give our best, do a great job and expect that from the others and if we don’t get it ask for it.

The part of the research proposal has been also very cool for me. We need to become a culture of investigation and propose things according to the things we find out. We tend to leave investigation for the engineering and are not conscious that our studies also need to improve and have new things.

Besides we can have better ideas of things that we want to know and can help us be more aware of the situations and needs of our society.

Additionally, it is an advantage to have a good guidance through the process, being able to reach the professor at any time and receive help.

Finally, in the entire course I find important how we become more aware of the importance of the form and the content, and how we are getting ready to meet international standards.

North America setting examples for the world

A Closer Look at North America

(North America Political Map, taken from Yahoo Images)

America is such a broad continent that it has been divided in different subcontinents: South America, Central America and North America.

However, there are different definitions on what really North America is. Some people talk about it as just the United States and Canada, other add to those two Mexico and other islands in the Atlantic and others take central America as well.

So in the presentation made by Natalia Barco, Laura García, Annika Ekström and Marie Nilsson, they define North America according to the National Encyklopedin, which says: “North America, the north part of the double continent America; 24.4 million sq km, 529 million inhabitants. Greenland, Canada, USA, Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean belong to North America… In some occasions Central America and the Caribbean are separated as special regions and sometimes North America is used synonymously to the cultural concept Anglo America in contrast to Latin America.”

It is also important to highlight, that Greenland belongs to Denmark and like that it is consider as a part of Europe, and Hawaii geographically part of Oceania as a State of the USA is considered part of North America.

But as in the presentation, despite of how broad North America has been defined, there will be a focus on three countries, Canada, Mexico and the USA.
These three countries are linked geographically, share some similar historic roots and economically are very important due to its FTA, the NAFTA (North America Free Trade Agreement). This FTA was signed in 1992 and has been a reference in trade all around the world, inspiring many others FTAs.

The NAFTA according to the presentation has 2 main objectives, being one the gradual reduction of tariffs and other trade barriers for goods as well as for services and the other one is to create a free-trade bloc.

With the constitution of America, we have to consider the influence of Europe, and how the Spanish were important especially for Mexico, and British and French for the USA and Canada, among other European immigrants as the Dutch and the Irish.

But the American continent was not only occupied by European immigrants, before them there were many important indigenous communties, Some of the managed to survived, while others were killed by the many diseases European broughts such as the flues, or by the Europeans.

And Europeans didn’t come alone either, they brought the slaves making America a place where different cultures met and have been living together, shaping the continent.

However, dispite the similitudes each country faced different historical facts, geographical differences and many other things that made them unique.


United States

General Info:
· Its capital is Washington D.D
· It has an Area of 9826630 km2
· And they have a population of around 307 millions.
· Considering their GDP it is of USD 14,11 trillions and the GDP per capita is USD 46820. The USA is the number one economy in the world.

(Foto taken from Getty Images, "Bald eagle in front of American flag" by Vicky Hart)

In the presentation, they addressed some mains issues as:

Immigration, where they higlighted the importance of immigrants for the population groth in the States and the creativity and innovaion they have brought. Nevertheless, there has always been a difficult concerning the iligal immigrants entering the country, in some places as Miami and California there are also issues between “Americans” and Latin people (cubans, mexicans…) and after September 11 the rejection many immigrants face, specially the ones coming from the Middle East or who are muslims.

The other topic, was the Government, being important the institution of the three branches “legislative”, “judicial” and “gobernment” and how the idea of the democratic government was develop there in order to response to the abuses, specially with taxes, that Great Britain was imposing to its colonies in North America. There were a lot of important people who fought for the independence of the 13 colonies in North America and who build a governamental institution and structure that is very important in today’s world. The people form the States are proud of that and in many of their symblos as their flag you can see features realted to the 13 colonies and how they became what they are.
(Foto taken from Getty Images. "Mount Rushmore National Memorial" by Ed Freeman)


At the moment the US president is Barack Obama, something important is the fact that he is the first Africanamerican president.

With the culture, it is important to talk about the role of religion with a religious diversity, but clearly more towards Christianity, not all of them are catholics and there are christian religions as the mormons that were born there, but the common line is that they follow Christian beliefs.

The food has a huge european influence. But in the States they are facing problems as obesity due to the lack of a healthy food style and the junk food available everywhere. So it represents a major challenge for the States since it is better to have a population who knows about and has access to healthy food, undertake fitness programs and like that are able to have a healthy life.

And finally, the business culture, where they are individualistic, look forward to take advantage of all the posibilities out there and treasure time since “time is money”.

Canada

General Info:
· It’s capital is Ottawa
· It has an area of 9984670 km2, what makes them the second largest country
· It has a population of around 33 millions
· Its GDP is of USD 1307 trillions and the GDP per capita is of USD 39300

(Image taken from Getty Images. "Hand holding maple leaf with canadian symbols on it" by Kain Zernitsky)

In the presentation, they talk about facts as the weather, since due to its position they hace really cold winters, and in the north areas they actually have the Antartic.

The languages are also very important since Canada has two official languages English and French and there is also space for many other languages, which their immigrants and families keep as Mandarin. In the way they are supporting multiculturalism, there is also space in many schools according to the communities to teach classes in other languages, for example in the Province of Saskatchewan many slavic languages are the most common at school.

With the government they are a parlamientary government and constitutional monarchy. While they States was figthing for their independence, Canada took a different road, so they still are related to the British Crown having the Queen Elizabeth II as thier head of State with a governor acting on her behalf, but they have an independence in their decisions.

Culturally, Canada is very diverse. With the multiculturalism policy you can see space for different religions, foods, customs… everythin according to the background of people. But the most well known are the features coming from the British culture and the French one, who were the most and the ones who define and build the country. Anyway, those particular cultures also live with general ones, which are the culture of each province and the national culture. Each province has symbols and features that makes it different from the others and special for the country, and as Canada there are general things as the beaver and the mapple leaf, important for their history and they are also in the road trying to define what really means be a canadian.

(Foto taken from Getty Images. "Beaver carrying a stick through pond in Elk Island National Park, Alberta" by Peter Essick)

In the business culture, they appreciate punctuality, they are reserved and more conservative.

Mexico

General info:
· Its capital is Mexico D-F
· It has an area of 1972550 km2
· Its population is around 111 millions
· It has a GDP of USD 1559 trillions and teh GDP per capita is of USD 14200.

In the presentation they talk about Mexico and its most important features, drawing special attention to its natural resources with oil, copper, gold, zinc…, its climatic and geographical diversity, and its cultural background with the Spanish and the inidigenous cultures, that still play a significant role for the community.
With the exports they are very important with grain crops, being the most important the corn.

(Image taken from Getty Images. "Mayan Pyramid, Chichen Itza, Yucatan, Mexico" by Martin Shields)

Mexico is a presidential democratic republic.

Economically, they are growing fast, and they are becoming important in sectors as telecommunications not only inside Mexico, but in Latinamerica.

In their culture, the social stratifications and the machism play an important role. And they are in their body language very expressive and enjoy being close to people.

It is a very touristic country, and there are many nice places to explore and they have a very reach culture.

Finally, the corporate culture has values as puntuality, hey like to take time for the negotiations so they go slowly and Spanish is usually the language to go with for business.
(Foto taken from Getty Images. "Performers in front of Palacio de Justicia" by Ryan Fox)

North America, is definetly a place full of opportunities and interesting features to study and these three countries are leaders somehow in today’s world, so it is important to keep an eye on them, look for partnerships and learn from them.

Special Note:

This Blog was made and design by María Camila Restrepo Zuluaga, Julia María Rodas Jaramillo and María Natalia Suárez Vallejo

References:

1. Barco, N.. & García, L. & Ekström A. & Nilsson, M. 2009. Presentation "North America" part of the subject Organizations and Cultures at the University EAFIT.

2. Notes of the subject “North America studies” at the University EAFIT, 2008

Australia and its culture and strategies

Influence of Culture in Business

1. Describe Baird et al (2007)’s paper in terms of research methodology

As the authors said at the beginning of the paper “The culture of Australian organizations and its relation with strategy”, the first purpose of it is to add and corroborate the research of Sarros and co-authors by examining the culture of Australian organizations, but using a different version of the Organizational Culture Profile and a different subsample of Australian managers.

So, been persistent with their objective, they selected randomly from the Kompass Australia Directory 400 financial controllers in manufacturing and services industries in the country and sent to them a format with some questions via mail. Only 184 completed surveys where receive which represents the 46% of the total of the questionnaires.

The results that the research dropped was grouped and analyzed in order to realize if the hypothesis that they had established (According to what the authors that they mentioned in the paper said) and their research about the topic converged with the findings.

The hypothesis where the following:

1. Organizations with a prospector strategy will have an organizational culture that is (a) more innovative, (b) less stable, (c) less focused on attention to detail, and (d) more outcome oriented than organizations with a defender strategy, with analyzers in between.
2. Organizations with a reactor strategy will have an organizational culture that is weaker in respect of all organizational cultural dimensions than organizations with a defender, prospector, or analyzer strategy.
These hypotheses are developed after two structures were well thought-out. In the first one Organizational culture was measured using the Windsor and Ashkanasy (1996) adaptation of the Organizational Culture Profile (OCP) of O’Reilly et al. (1991) and the second one, was done under Sarros et al. (2002)

Both structures showed similarities because in some way, the authors that were selected to make them used the adaptations of the OCP that was derived from O’Reilly et al.’s (1991). But according to the authors of the paper “the main difference between the two structures is that Outcome Orientation in W&A is split into two factors, labelled Performance Orientation and Competitiveness by Sarros et al. (2002). The Outcome Orientation values of ‘being results oriented’ and ‘having high expectations for performance’ loaded on Sarros et al.’s (2002) factor labelled Performance Orientation, while the values of ‘being achievement oriented’ and ‘being competitive’ loaded on Competitiveness”

By the other side, the results of the questionnaire help the authors to develop a table about the factor loadings and descriptive statistics for organizational culture component items, where they could identify how much important was for the sample, in average, each of the principal component of the OC. Also, they did the same, but just with the principal factors, and in conclusion, the order of importance that the Australians gave to these factors in the organization was:
Outcome Orientation
Respect for People
Attention to Detail
Team Orientation
Innovation
Stability

Then the next analysis was base on notice how much importance each strategic types gives to these principal factors and for last, the same exercise was made, but instead of the strategic types, they analyzed the case of the services and manufacturing companies.

In the analysis of the strategic types, according to the authors of the paper, the results for Innovation, Outcome Orientation and Stability are significant and in the expected direction (taking into account that the financial controllers classified from 1 to 5 the factors, where lower scores represent higher levels of cultural factors) For Innovation, prospectors have the lowest mean score (indicating the highest level of Innovation) at 2.58, followed by analyzers (2.74), defenders (2.76) and reactors trailing at 3.58. For Outcome Orientation,
prospectors have the lowest mean score (indicating the highest level of Outcome Orientation) at 1.75, followed by analyzers (1.84), defenders (2.07) and reactors (2.27).
For Stability, defenders have the lowest mean score (indicating the highest level of
Stability) at 2.26, followed by analyzers (2.35), prospectors (2.77) and reactors (2.85).
The results for Attention to Detail show no significant differences (although the means
are in the expected order of greatest importance for defenders followed by analyzers,
prospectors and reactors).

Hence, while the results were in the expected direction for all four cultural dimensions,
Hypothesis 1 is only partially supported in terms of two of the four cultural factors
(Outcome Orientation and Stability).

For last, the results of the analysis of Services and Manufacturing companies where very similar, According to the authors “While previous studies have produced mixed findings, our results suggest no difference in culture across the two industries. The egalitarian nature of Australian societal culture might also explain the lack of observed differences in the organizational cultures of service and manufacturing organizations.”

2. What were the main findings on Baird et al (2007)?

The Culture of Australian Organizations

In the study the Organizational Culture Profile (OCP) of O’Reilly et al. (1991), was used to describe the culture of Australian organizations, as perceived by those organizations’ financial controllers.

The study found the perceptions of financial controllers of Australian organizational culture were similar to the perceptions of managers.

One of the finding was that that the most prominent characteristic of Australian organizational culture was Outcome Orientation, followed by Respect for People, with Stability and Innovation being the least prominent characteristics.

Organizational culture is an important determinant of managers’ and employees’ work attitudes, decisions and behavior and, ultimately, an organization’s financial performance.

Less auspicious is the low ranking of Innovation, a cultural factor characterized by a willingness to experiment, being innovative, being quick to take advantage of opportunities, and risk taking. Most of the findings are consistent with Sarros et al. (2002) study.

With respect to Australian social or national culture, and its implications for organizational culture, tell us that the country is egalitarian, mateship and Individualistic characteristics, Ashkanasy et al. (2000, p. 42) found that the “mateship” characteristic of Australian national culture “represents a leadership style that focuses on the group”, with leaders expected to be “one of the boys” (or girls?).

Egalitarianism (the belief that people should be treated the same and as equals) has consistently been identified as an Australian cultural trait, and seen by Sarros et al. (2005, p. 176) as “the ability of Australian leaders to engage socially with workers while also nurturing and developing their careers”.

National cultural characteristics: according to Triandis (1995, pp. 44-48) Australian society is “horizontally individualistic”. Horizontal individualism recognizes the egalitarianism aspect of Australian culture and describes a culture where people are regarded as independent of each other and self-reliant and self-directed (individualism), countries that are horizontal individualist do not like people who “stick out”,

The egalitarian nature of Australian societal culture might also explain the lack of observed differences in the organizational cultures of service and manufacturing organizations. That is, in a less egalitarian society, organizational culture might be consciously articulated to fit the organizational context such that service industries might seek to generate more people-oriented cultures than manufacturing. However, in a highly egalitarian society, where a people-oriented culture is generally strong, the societal-driven cultural characteristic might transcend industry differences.

References:
Baird, K,. Harrison, G,. Reeve, R. 2007. THE CULTURE OF AUSTRALIAN
ORGANIZATIONS AND ITS RELATION WITH STRATEGY. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS STUDIES . VOL 15, NO1, pg 15 of 41.


3. How does the culture of Australian organizations relate to their strategy?

Before we can explain the relation between the Australian culture and their strategy, as Baird, Harrison and Reeve (2007) did, it is important to define first the general relation between culture and strategy.

As the authors say, a lot has been studied between this relation, and while some findings said that cultures are strategies themselves to overcome basic life difficulties and survive (Bate, 1994), others say that culture limits strategic options (Schein, 2004) and others that it is the strategies that limit cultures (Joyce and Slocum, 1990).

So no matter how it is studied the truth lies in the fact that culture and strategy are interrelated and are basic to make possible for the organization the accomplishment of its goals as (Baird, Harrison and Reeve, 2007).

After clarifying that relation, we can start studying the factors relating those concepts in Australia.

In the research Baird, Harrison and Reeve (2207) carried out and compared to other research they conclude that the most important feature from the Australian organizational culture is their “Outcome Orientation” as well as the “Respect for people”, while the less relevant has been “Innovation”.

Like that when Australians define their strategies they are seeking for concrete results and the important thing is the result achieved more than the pat to get there. As the authors mentioned those results influence the concept of a successful company and determines how the workers should behave and what attitudes there are. That has also made the companies’ strategies to focus in the financial performance (Thanks to that some authors as Windsor and Ashkanasy (2006) consider the Australian organizations “financial controllers).

Due to the importance of results, the companies also define strategies that allow them to have lasting results on time, maintaining the good performances (Baird, Harrison and Reeve, 2007).

That organizational culture and strategies have advantages, but there are lacks in other aspects as Innovation, what makes companies afraid to experiment and be more aware of new opportunities. Somehow, it is also related to their Outcome Orientation, since Innovation also means taking risks, and when your working toward a result you want to achieve you want to get there in the less risky way possible.

But it also depends on other factors as the economical and social ones that are forcing Australia to consider more Innovation (Sarros, 2002).

Some of the economic reasons shown by Sarros are concerning the recent change the industry is facing because of the transition of a protectionist government to the exposure of micro- and macroeconomic reforms that have changes from the labor market to other as tariff.

The social changes motioned by Baird, Harrison and Reeve (2007) are more related to a new tendency leaving behind its “mate” and layback oriented work environment. Australian companies are becoming more aware of the need to innovate in order to succeed in today’s world and as Sarros (2007) said be “more competitive in the global stage”.

Still the mateship orientation has some good features as the importance of the group work and the support among its members. It is pretty much related to “People Respect”, which also encourages the individual rights and the values of people. Like that Baird, Harrison and Reeve (2007) describe the society as horizontally individualistic; it means that they are self-reliant but equalitarian too (Triandis, 1995).

These tendencies in the society makes the strategies of the companies to look for social responsibility establish a good reputation and have a clear philosophy (Sarros, 2002).

After this analysis of the three main characteristics between culture and strategies within the organization, one of the main conclusions was that in Australia stability plays an important role, and that the culture is an essential part of the definition of the strategies.

References:
Baird, K. & Harrison, R. & Reeve, R. 2007. The culture of Australian Organizations and its relation with strategy. International journal of Business Studies, 15(1): 15-41

4. How does Roy Green (2009)’s article relates to Australian culture and Australian organizations?


Roy Green is relating both parts first when he asseverate the willingness of Australia to get out of the crisis, in this is possible just by following the advises given by some economic authorities. In this way they will try to accomplish the challenge of the short term boost to demand, and by creating a sustainable value creation supported in a long term capacity for innovation and entrepreneurship. So, this is the moment when firms can’t just stay rigid waiting for others to act in behalf of them, but is time for firms to be more innovative, to impulse that creativity in their employees. Those that because their culture has that sparkle of creating things easily, thinking about the consumer and its needs, the products and services that could be bought in a store so they can launch them into the market with more success So by the time they are solving something that have more immediate effects by giving what the market is exactly looking for, is injecting some prosperity and hope with that inventive in a long term using their population which its majority like to live in better conditions improving their lives

References

Business Studies, 15 (1). 15-41), and Green (2009) (full reference: Green, Roy (2009). Innovation the key to recovety. The Australian. 1st April 2009).

Special Note: This blog was made by Juliana Chacón Piedrahita, Mónica Ordoñes Buitrago, María Camila Restrepo Zuluaga, Julia María Rodas Jaramillo and María Natalia Suárez Vallejo

Oceania a continet full of surprises

Getting to know Oceania better

(Map of Oceania taken from Yahoo Images)

Oceania is a continent but unlike the other ones, it is not continuous formed but many islands, and a lot of people do not know much about it, the countries that people associate with this continent are Australia and New Zealand. But the other ones are unknown or not easily located on map by the majority of us.

This continent is divided into 4 regions: Micronesia, Australasia, Melanesia and Polynesia.

In this blog we are going focus on the Australia region, this is composed by three countries: New Zealand, Australia and Papua New Guinea. The first two countries are getting a big importance in today’s globalized world, and the tendency is that PNG will follow the steps of their neighbors in order to develop themselves and get both market benefits and transmission of technology.

These three countries have a lot of things in common, but a very important factor is their history, all of them make part of the common wealth and for all of them England represents a big power and the Queen Elizabeth II figures as their monarch.

These three countries are very proud of their aborigine people, and the diversity of ethnic groups and nature are a big deal for these cultures. But things differ; In PNG the majority of the population is aborigine and still conserves a lot of the traditional customs and heritage. And in New Zealand with a 78% and Australia with 92% of white Europeans descendents, are more westernized cultures. This does not mean that the European ethnic group does not respect or try to conserve the original culture of these places, but instead they respect and try to conserve them, they advertise through tourism the origins of the culture, which is very diverse and reach, and for years this countries have been living in a peaceful environment where there is no internal wars, because there is no social discrimination and the people of these countries are either Australian or New Zealand no better or less because of their ascendance.

These differences these countries they live in peace with their past and know how to enjoy the future under tolerance and the multiculturalism approach. Taking the best from everyone and projecting the future with all of the good things that differences bring.

Question: Australia is one of the world´s driest countries, how does it manage to survive these extreme natural conditions?

According to (Marsh, 2002) Australia is one of the world´s biggest agricultural exporters, this comes as a surprise that a country which counts with extremely dry conditions can beat countries like Colombian at the agricultural sector, but the difference is that the government pays a lot of attention and take the right measures so the farmers are incentivized to remain in the countryside and continue to do their job as competitive as possible.

(Photo taken from Getty Images. "Pinnacles at Night" by Grant V. Faint)

As an example for this we can mention the year 2002, when Australia was experimenting harsh drought breaks. So the government created a fund from which farmers could lend money at really low interest rates and up to an amount of a $100,000. The other measure it implemented was the creation of a drought fore, that consists in putting to work unemployed hands alongside famers which suffer from the drought, by doing this farmers will get extra help managing the harsh conditions and employment will be generated. (Marsh, 2002)

Special Note:

This Blog was made and design by María Camila Restrepo Zuluaga, Julia María Rodas Jaramillo and María Natalia Suárez Vallejo

References:

1. Echeverri, S. & Torres, M.L. 2009. Presentation "Oceania" part of the subject Organizations and Cultures at the University EAFIT

2. Marsh, V. 2002. Farmers given more help. Financial Times, London (UK).